HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2012, 04:17 PM   #21
Lew Silverman
VIP Member
 
Lew Silverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: A short continuation of my "VENT" before Indy !!

So are we saying that there is NO performance advantage to racing a stick over an automatic (or vice versa)? And after we "combine" all of the like-factored vehicles into one class, what do we do when a single vehicle does enter an event where Class Eliminations are being contested?

If the reason that the "Combo" programs were started was as Jeff said, to economize on the expenditures for trophies and contingencies payments, then how about a frame-able certificate for all of the regular class winners. Keep giving the "special classes" and Stock Eliminator winners the "Wally". And isn't a product purchase and usage required to collect a contingency payment from the Manufacturer? What does it matter how many cars are in a certain class if you're using and advertising a Manufacturer's product?

Why are we (they) complicating this?
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070
"The Wagon Master" N/SA
Lew Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 04:26 PM   #22
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: A short continuation of my "VENT" before Indy !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lew Silverman View Post
So are we saying that there is NO performance advantage to racing a stick over an automatic (or vice versa)? And after we "combine" all of the like-factored vehicles into one class, what do we do when a single vehicle does enter an event where Class Eliminations are being contested?

If the reason that the "Combo" programs were started was as Jeff said, to economize on the expenditures for trophies and contingencies payments, then how about a frame-able certificate for all of the regular class winners. Keep giving the "special classes" and Stock Eliminator winners the "Wally". And isn't a product purchase and usage required to collect a contingency payment from the Manufacturer? What does it matter how many cars are in a certain class if you're using and advertising a Manufacturer's product?

Why are we (they) complicating this?
To answer your question about the advantage It depends greatly on each combination. In my case 4 cyl FWD. If I put in a manual trans I would pick up from .3 to .5 (thats tenths not hundreths) With a manual I can get a 4.12 final drive ratio. With the automatic the best (other than custom one of gears) . I can use is 3.72.
NHRA is blaming the combo classes on the manufacturers. But in real life it's about saving trophies. They fail to realize a lot of cars (at over $300 a car) don't show because of their desision.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 04:48 PM   #23
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: A short continuation of my "VENT" before Indy !!

If you go through the Nitro Joe stats, you will see a majority of classes that differentiate between the auto and stick trans by class, the auto trans racers are the quickest of the two.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 04:52 PM   #24
Andrew Hill
Senior Member
 
Andrew Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 700
Likes: 446
Liked 170 Times in 38 Posts
Default Re: A short continuation of my "VENT" before Indy !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee View Post
If you go through the Nitro Joe stats, you will see a majority of classes that differentiate between the auto and stick trans by class, the auto trans racers are the quickest of the two.
One of the main reasons for that is a lot more people race automatics, plus they are more likely to have heads up, so they need to spend the money to go faster.

I have no problem combining automatics with sticks, but if they do, they need to get a few of the horsepower factors in line (i.e. LS1).
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED
Andrew Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 05:40 PM   #25
Ed Carpenter
Live Reporter
 
Ed Carpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
Default Re: A short continuation of my "VENT" before Indy !!

This thread is just another reminder that you will never get enough people to agree on something to get it done. Since I've been on CL I've seen tons of ideas about all kinds of things. Its always the same some for it most against it and the rest just don't care. I just don't see anything ever getting done. Debating ideas is always good but there never is a consensus on anything proposed. My .02
__________________
Ed Carpenter
2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM
Race Engine Development
Ed Carpenter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2012, 01:24 PM   #26
Monte Howard
Member
 
Monte Howard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Potomac,IL
Posts: 279
Likes: 1
Liked 71 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: A short continuation of my "VENT" before Indy !!

Still trying to wrap my mind around the idea that auto trans are faster than stick.
Why did Wescott go to stick then?
__________________
Monte Howard 3209 STK, 3208 SS
Monte Howard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2012, 06:59 PM   #27
Rod Greene
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 530
Likes: 422
Liked 242 Times in 81 Posts
Default Re: A short continuation of my "VENT" before Indy !!

Seems to me the AH cars got less HP with the stick therefore lighter weight. No Brainer. With all the e-shift autos and air shifters any monkey can drive an automatic just stab and steer.
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects.

Last edited by Rod Greene; 09-14-2012 at 07:01 PM.
Rod Greene is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2012, 08:08 PM   #28
Monte Howard
Member
 
Monte Howard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Potomac,IL
Posts: 279
Likes: 1
Liked 71 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: A short continuation of my "VENT" before Indy !!

The AH cars have the same rating for the auto as the stick, that is why I used them as a example.
__________________
Monte Howard 3209 STK, 3208 SS
Monte Howard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2012, 08:32 PM   #29
Lew Silverman
VIP Member
 
Lew Silverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: A short continuation of my "VENT" before Indy !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod Greene View Post
Seems to me the AH cars got less HP with the stick therefore lighter weight. No Brainer. With all the e-shift autos and air shifters any monkey can drive an automatic just stab and steer.

Did I miss a memo from Glendale? I know we get a 3-speed next year!

Lew
(definitely NOT a monkey!)
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070
"The Wagon Master" N/SA
Lew Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2012, 08:47 PM   #30
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A short continuation of my "VENT" before Indy !!

Did any guys that signed this race that weekend? What person in their right mind who loves class racing would sign this crap? Class and dial in should never be mentioned in the same sentence.


QUOTE=louie conkey;346142]I had my petition at Indy and got quite a few signatures on it. I will bring it to the JEG’s race in Columbus as due to the shortened Indy event I didn’t get to some racers who wanted to sign it. Now some people on this site are talking about combining stick and automatic classes into one. It still is wrong. I’m sure it will happen soon, if we don’t make our voices heard. Free Speech you know.

If NHRA continues the “Combo” run-off, I think it should be off a dial-in not off the indexes. See the Combo Race at Indy, where in the automatic class a truck ran at 1.55 under the index and in the stick class a J/S was a second under. Other cars had no chance to run against them unless they would break or red light. (I know that’s the case in any match-up but Really!)

Find me in Columbus or I can find you to sign my petition in an attempt to be heard to stop the way NHRA is insisting on doing this “COMBO” RACE.[/QUOTE]
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.