Year End Horsepower Adjustments...

[Bryan Worner]

I want to send out a big "thank you" to the LT1 Super Stock GT competitor(s) that got us 4 more horsepower! Great Job!!

[Dave Tincher]

Originally Posted by Bryan Worner

I want to send out a big "thank you" to the LT1 Super Stock GT competitor(s) that got us 4 more horsepower! Great Job!!

Thanks you for noticing all of our hard work.

[Bryan Worner]

Don't go breaking your arm patting yourself on the back there David! Because the only thing I notice is stupidity when some no driving **** triggers a review just to thump his chest!

[Dave Tincher]

Originally Posted by Bryan Worner

Don't go breaking your arm patting yourself on the back there David! Because the only thing I notice is stupidity when some no driving **** triggers a review just to thump his chest!

Thats pretty harsh. Never considerd myself the best driver but a no driving**** kind of mean dont you think?

[Rusty Davenport]

Originally Posted by Dave Tincher

Thats pretty harsh. Never considerd myself the best driver but a no driving**** kind of mean dont you think?

what are you and Worner talking about ??? You guys are not even at the STOCK hp rating for the LT1 .........isn't that kind of cheezy ????

[Ed Wright]

Originally Posted by Rusty Davenport

what are you and Worner talking about ??? You guys are not even at the STOCK hp rating for the LT1 .........isn't that kind of cheezy ????

An actual stock LT1 makes nowhere the NHRA Stock Eliminator HP rating. There is a LOT of work in those heads that is passing tech. Plus, it is a very efficient car. Light, aero-slick with a lot of natural engine set back. If it was rated at what a factory stock LT1 actually makes they would be even more dangerous.

[Lew Silverman]

Can anyone shed some light on why the exact same motor, 1966 275HP 327 Chevy, should be rated differently in the three body styles (Nova, Chevelle and Full-size) it was originally available in? I can understand that there might have been a difference from the factory, but are people building these motors differently depending on which vehicle they are putting them in?

Thanks!

[Rusty Davenport]

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

An actual stock LT1 makes nowhere the NHRA Stock Eliminator HP rating. There is a LOT of work in those heads that is passing tech. Plus, it is a very efficient car. Light, aero-slick with a lot of natural engine set back. If it was rated at what a factory stock LT1 actually makes they would be even more dangerous.

that was my point Ed........the NHRA Super Stock LT1 horsepower rating is nowhere close to the NHRA STOCK hp rating........what is the problem ??? Super Stock horsepower should be raised to at least match NHRA STOCK rating----does that not make sense ????

[Greg Hill]

Originally Posted by Bryan Worner

Don't go breaking your arm patting yourself on the back there David! Because the only thing I notice is stupidity when some no driving **** triggers a review just to thump his chest!

Boys, when you build a motor for GT you gotta know there are a lot of people out there who are gonna get it hit. Think about the guys that can buy a new motor any time they want to. Especially if it's a Chevy.

[Monte Howard]

Charlie Bob, there would be more room for improvement if it wasn't basically a super stock motor already. Couldn't resist.