HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-06-2013, 09:27 PM   #11
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 2,928
Liked 5,147 Times in 1,964 Posts
Cool Re: Why did you build your "slow" stock eliminator car?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarysZ24 View Post
Thanks for the thread Ron, and I can relate to alot of what I read so far with regards to cost, going against the norm combo wise, and even the consistency part being a challenge (on occasion), although I've had many races where my car was consistent, without breaking my bank account. However, I did not have a soft index in the beginning with my Cavalier. I'm not sure who ran my engine/tranny combo prior to the mid-90's (when I started racing my car), but being factored at 150hp, when my oem hp was 120 was outrageous! Only in '99 was my car able to run better than my index. My car was originally factored to run BF/SA, and the Bandimere Speedway altitude adjusted index of 16.44 was only beaten once (in '99 at the Mopar Mile High Nationals), I ran a 16.42, and a 16.449 with the car enroute to a rnd three loss). My car was factored alongside turbo 2.2 Chrysler products, that clearly had a performance advantage over my mfi 2.8V6! I didn't get hp taken off until around 2002, when it dropped to 140hp. I didn't run the number then either, and kept asking them to remove more hp, and NHRA did to I believe 130? I ran with that until they redid the class structure for fwd cars, and then the ahfs must've answered my prayers, because after the 2008 Arizona Nat's, I was dropped again to my current 125 hp. However, now I have a new delima in that Mickey Thompson stopped making the 20x8x14 and the 20x6x14 slicks, so now I'll have to race with bigger tires, which may offer some new challenges...I wish I lived close to either Billy Nees, or to Woodro Josey (even Craig Railsback at Blower Drive Systems, since he's another ace with understanding the Accel Calmap engine management system).

If I didn't run this car, I now wish I would've raced a '90 Pylmouth Acclaim I once had because that car was consistent...so much that I went five rounds at an import race Bandimere Speedway had back in July y2k. Had I not had so much time and over $8k invested in the Cavalier, I would've switch to racing that car because Mopar parts could've helped me get that car to race the now EF/S index, and it would've been easier to work on and tune...perhaps more consistent than my decently predictable Cavalier. I bet Stan Kopetjka is glad he runs a Mopar fwd 4banger, and heck, even Rob Seibeneck with his US Nats multi-round winning Ford Tempo, as well.

As for my car, it will run consistent, it's different, and when the driver gets his act together, it'll be up there with Stan's car, Michael Beards car, and Rob's car. I sure love being the tortoise in stock races, and so does my wallet!!!

That's all that thing is now, 125hp? Jeez.
We ran 14.20's with the iron head Cimarron and a stick, over 20 years ago!
I think I'll get one of those things...

A second under for under a grand...What do you think, guys?
Anybody know of any out there?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.