|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 271
Likes: 54
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Yes... L79 - 350HP / 327".... factored down from the factory rating
__________________
Larry Fulton |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 294
Likes: 102
Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
What a no brainer decision this is......327/275/274 vs 327/350/287!
Did I read the tech sheet correctly because the way I read it for 13 HP here is what you get: Heads, Valves, CAM, Compression ,an Aluminum High Rise Manifold, and a bit more carb. Naah..I must be dreaming or is this combination really a gift? Sure makes me wish I had a 66 deuce 4 speed !
__________________
Mike Keener A/S B/S C/SM Last edited by Mike Keener; 04-28-2013 at 03:55 PM. Reason: forgot a spec |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 286
Liked 979 Times in 197 Posts
|
![]()
...............
Last edited by Lyn Smith; 04-28-2013 at 04:07 PM. Reason: double post |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 294
Likes: 102
Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Hey Lynn..How are ya man?!
The way I read the 66 blueprint specs it looks like both combos us a small Holley but the carb notes appear to me that the 350 hp is a bit bigger than the 275 hp. In 67 the 275 used a QJet which is obviously superior, but the 350 disappeared at the end of 66 unless it hung around in a Corvette but I'm too lazy to look. I know one thing- there was never a 327/350 offered in a Camaro. Not even in a 69 car which which offered the most engine options I have ever seen.
__________________
Mike Keener A/S B/S C/SM |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 57
Liked 507 Times in 116 Posts
|
![]()
The q-jet is an optional carb in the 66 275 horse combo.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sedalia, Mo
Posts: 436
Likes: 331
Liked 316 Times in 61 Posts
|
![]()
Danny Byrd is FAST no matter what carb he has!
__________________
Bob Shaw V/SA 515 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: 07058
Posts: 89
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
And they were still offered in a 67 Nova all models to a SS. 1968 New Body Chevelle it was still rated at 325. Exhaust was the excuse. http://www.oldride.com/library/1967_chevrolet_nova.html |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Billings Mt
Posts: 282
Likes: 186
Liked 54 Times in 18 Posts
|
![]()
Didnt the 68 327/325 combo have a cast iron intake & Q-jet ? A guy used to run one at Miami
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: 07058
Posts: 89
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Same hyd. #151 hydraulic cam. The 327-350(325) hp engine could give many big blocks a run for their money. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My friend had a *66 4sp Malibu bench with a 327/275 and I put the GM-151-350 hp cam ,poly locks..jetted and a set of OK-Kustom headers.. dam thing was a terror @ high 12s on old MH 'ers and had GTOs running scared. For most ,that combo had some cred back in 1970. Last edited by RJDUDEK; 04-28-2013 at 08:55 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Indy
Posts: 103
Likes: 18
Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Yes. A friend of mine had one (original equipment) in a 68 Chevy II and I had one that came out of a Chevelle. Same pistons, heads, (2.02 intakes) and camshaft as the 350 H.P. motor but with a cast intake and Q-Jet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|