|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 576
Likes: 298
Liked 748 Times in 137 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Sure, it would flow more, and to be precise, it would flow the square root of (28/25) times the original X cfm.. And that right there is what started this thread off in the first place ! ![]() ![]() Kevin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Kevin,
Using math to extrapolate from 25 to 28 is correct. The laws of Physics allow us to do that, but you assumed there was nothing wrong (called a Problem) with the port that the increase in air speed didn't magnify or make show up. There, that is the Real World problem with extrapolation and with assumptions. As I've said or aluded to.... That is one of the reasons why there is a lot of salesmanship in below 28 numbers. There is no way in He** I would buy a head that was flowed @ 10 or 25 or anywhere in between and the numbers extropolated up to another flow number. That is IF I was buying based solely on flow numbers (which I wouldn't do, not a good idea!)
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 07-18-2013 at 12:12 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
It's kind of like using barometric pressure, humidity and temperature to predict ET without taking into account oxygen content in the air.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,586 Times in 583 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|