|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 778
Likes: 530
Liked 231 Times in 107 Posts
|
![]()
Yep
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wingdale, NY
Posts: 302
Likes: 27
Liked 53 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
In response to "build a newer car so you can run roller cam" I posted that question just to make sure before I spend $ on lifters, thats all. I am a low buck guy, will have 12K total in my 65 BBC Impala.
Not just newer cars with roller cam, I have all parts to build that 151 4 Cylinder for the 85 Camaro to run W/SA , that has roller cam plus FI. Will L |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 1,074
Liked 800 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]()
Would allowing roller cams/lifters in place of flat tappet cams/lifters save racers money? Yes. But is that where we want things to go? My personal opinion...no.That said, there are several areas where rules changes could be made in Stock that would save racers significant costs while still being reflective of the intention of the class. -Al
__________________
"That'll never work....." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,613
Liked 7,865 Times in 1,750 Posts
|
![]()
Was the study on this done by the GAO?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
|
![]() Quote:
Lol to the "Slacker" comment too Dan...I'd shake your hand for that one!!!! ![]()
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) Last edited by GarysZ24; 01-16-2016 at 07:00 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 1,299
Liked 1,440 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
Sorry, I took your question literally. I think I understand now.
Quote:
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 561
Likes: 46
Liked 52 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
Dang, Nascar CUP cars, the big boys, have just recently switched to roller cams and lifters, imagine the beatings that the old flat tappet set up took and yet it stayed together.
Yeah, they also dropped the max RPM as well but before that you had an engine running non stop for hours at WOT at around 9K plus RPM. Very impressive indeed.
__________________
Bernie Cunningham 7053 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
Going to Roller Cams.
The racers will have new geometry to play with. More Spring, Duration and new level of breakage. Roller Cams will yield higher rpm. Leading to more and impressive dramatic catastrophic failure! Need a spring limit rule to back off from limits of material science. D |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 561
Likes: 46
Liked 52 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Does anybody know what the, before roller, spring pressures were on a Nascar CUP car?
__________________
Bernie Cunningham 7053 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|