HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2016, 02:41 PM   #1
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 712
Liked 1,606 Times in 584 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

The LD4B Edelbrock intake was approved as a replacement for the 273 due to the fact it was available with a Chrysler part number. The same rationale used on the 440 Chrysler 6-Pack engine with the Edelbrock intake. The 6-Pack intake was available in both aluminum and cast iron.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	LD4B 2.jpg
Views:	703
Size:	70.5 KB
ID:	37770  
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2016, 03:47 PM   #2
Coleydog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 572
Likes: 39
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDiv6 View Post
The LD4B Edelbrock intake was approved as a replacement for the 273 due to the fact it was available with a Chrysler part number. The same rationale used on the 440 Chrysler 6-Pack engine with the Edelbrock intake. The 6-Pack intake was available in both aluminum and cast iron.
Looks like it would flow better than that boat anchor.
Coleydog is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 12-01-2016, 04:08 PM   #3
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,613
Liked 7,830 Times in 1,750 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDiv6 View Post
The LD4B Edelbrock intake was approved as a replacement for the 273 due to the fact it was available with a Chrysler part number. The same rationale used on the 440 Chrysler 6-Pack engine with the Edelbrock intake. The 6-Pack intake was available in both aluminum and cast iron.
And using that rationale, the 283s and 327s should have the Z-28 intake and the AMCs should have all of the group 19 stuff back.
Come on out and race the new and improved Stock Eliminator! The same as ET-2 only more expensive and with a lower purse!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2016, 05:04 PM   #4
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 712
Liked 1,606 Times in 584 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
And using that rationale, the 283s and 327s should have the Z-28 intake and the AMCs should have all of the group 19 stuff back.
Come on out and race the new and improved Stock Eliminator! The same as ET-2 only more expensive and with a lower purse!
There are already 283 engines running the approved 327 intake.
The AMC Group 19 intake and carburetor was removed because of your diligence with NHRA. You should have probably done the same with all the other bogus that has been running out there for many years.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2016, 05:57 PM   #5
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,613
Liked 7,830 Times in 1,750 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDiv6 View Post
There are already 283 engines running the approved 327 intake.

You should have probably done the same with all the other bogus that has been running out there for many years.
I agree, the 283 should NOT have a 327 intake on it. BUT, at least it's an iron dual-plane intake replacing another iron dual-plane intake not an aluminum high-rise dual-plane replacing an iron low-rise (at best!) single-plane intake.

I absolutely wish that I could. I won't live long enough! Wouldn't it be nice if NHRA set aside a date like January 1 2018 and "reset" all of the f**kups.

Care to start a separate thread pointing them all out?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2016, 08:20 PM   #6
Frank Castros
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 2,668
Liked 2,753 Times in 974 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

Billy,
Please do, you're the man for the job.
Frank Castros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2016, 11:16 PM   #7
MR DERBY CITY
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 1,094
Liked 8,189 Times in 1,536 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
I agree, the 283 should NOT have a 327 intake on it. BUT, at least it's an iron dual-plane intake replacing another iron dual-plane intake not an aluminum high-rise dual-plane replacing an iron low-rise (at best!) single-plane intake.

I absolutely wish that I could. I won't live long enough! Wouldn't it be nice if NHRA set aside a date like January 1 2018 and "reset" all of the f**kups.

Care to start a separate thread pointing them all out?
Awesome idea billy, starting Jan 1 let's get all the bogus welfare off the cars and back home on the shelves where they belong.The cowl hood on 69 camaros.Looks as though NHRA took the initiative to correct this one, I just wonder why they stopped with the chevys and didn't correct the chryslers.
MR DERBY CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2016, 11:41 PM   #8
Coleydog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 572
Likes: 39
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by MR DERBY CITY View Post
Awesome idea billy, starting Jan 1 let's get all the bogus welfare off the cars and back home on the shelves where they belong.The cowl hood on 69 camaros.Looks as though NHRA took the initiative to correct this one, I just wonder why they stopped with the chevys and didn't correct the chryslers.
What hoods on Chrysler? Or correct what?
Coleydog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2016, 11:15 PM   #9
Frank Bialas
Member
 
Frank Bialas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 252
Likes: 6
Liked 23 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleydog View Post
What hoods on Chrysler? Or correct what?
Hey dog not sure what MR. D.C. is referring to? But fact is in 1966 MOTHER MOPAR had NO fresh air on anything, no books required!!! NONE!!! but they're out there.
__________________
Frank Bialas 1570 STK
Frank Bialas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2016, 11:57 PM   #10
Paul Precht
Senior Member
 
Paul Precht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 733
Likes: 362
Liked 327 Times in 121 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by MR DERBY CITY View Post
Awesome idea billy, starting Jan 1 let's get all the bogus welfare off the cars and back home on the shelves where they belong.The cowl hood on 69 camaros.Looks as though NHRA took the initiative to correct this one, I just wonder why they stopped with the chevys and didn't correct the chryslers.
I'm just guessing but I think maybe the Camaro racers took it upon themselves to start using that hood and the Chrysler racers have the factory's books to back them.
Paul Precht is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.