HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2021, 11:06 PM   #1
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 2,157
Liked 2,336 Times in 549 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory McNeil View Post
Personally, I think the modern "factory" PURPOSE BUILT race cars have made enough of a mockery of Stock Eliminator rules already, without kicking the door wide open to even more liberal allowances of non OE components.
May I ask what transmission you run?
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2021, 09:06 PM   #2
Dave Noll
Senior Member
 
Dave Noll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 709
Likes: 2,663
Liked 238 Times in 111 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
May I ask what transmission you run?
From a different thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory McNeil View Post
With my old M/S 85 5.0 Mustang, I ran a 3.19 low gear in the Jerico, and with 4.88 gears,

My SB Ford 4 speed G Force bracket car also has a 16.36 SLR,albeit with 31" tall tires, plus an additional 25 MPH,

Same with my old hot rod type cruiser, currently has a 2.78 low Toploader with 3.50 rear and 28" tall tires, a 9.73 SLR, and I am barely hitting 4th gear at the finish line.
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526
Dave Noll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2021, 12:24 AM   #3
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 315
Liked 1,103 Times in 301 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
May I ask what transmission you run?
I now have a G Force 4 speed, previously ran Jerico 4 speed. And these NHRA approved transmissions were behind a 5.0 Mustang engine, equipped with the exact same heads, intake manifold , carb, cam lift, etc, as tens of thousands of 85 5.0 Mustangs that had a VIN and were available ,(with warranty) for the street for anybody who walked into a Ford dealership,and drive one home. Can you say that about your COPO? Or do you honestly believe that there is anything "STOCK" about a hand built race car that never was available for street use, that uses engine combinations unavailable to the public in a street version, with a transmission that GM has not offered in 50 years, and a FORD differential that was NEVER available in a GM car ? Just curious.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 08-16-2021, 09:26 AM   #4
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 2,157
Liked 2,336 Times in 549 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory McNeil View Post
I now have a G Force 4 speed, previously ran Jerico 4 speed. And these NHRA approved transmissions were...
I'm thinking that we can both agree that allowing this was a good decision made by the NHRA?


Quote:
...behind a 5.0 Mustang engine, equipped with the exact same heads, intake manifold , carb, cam lift, etc., as tens of thousands of 85 5.0 Mustangs...
My COPO runs the same head, block, and fuel system as the production Camaro that was also built in the tens of thousands. The throttle body is 90mm just like the production throttle body. The exception would be the intake and cam lift. But, as I have stated many times before, if this were 1969 and the factories had access to these parts, do you really think that they wouldn't use them?


Quote:
...that had a VIN and were available ,(with warranty) for the street for anybody who walked into a Ford dealership, and drive one home. Can you say that about your COPO?...
The boat sailed on the VIN deal a very long time ago. There are plenty of examples of Body-In-White cars dating back to at least the seventies. There was also a time when you could drive your Stocker to the local track, change a few things, and be competitive in class. The rules have changed quite a lot since then. I think that we can agree that a competitive Stocker is now a designated, trailer riding, race car? A better question would be, "Is your Stocker street legal?".


Quote:
...Or do you honestly believe that there is anything "STOCK" about a hand built race car that never was available for street use, that uses engine combinations unavailable to the public in a street version, with a transmission that GM has not offered in 50 years, and a FORD differential that was NEVER available in a GM car ?
I have been "hand building" stockers since the 1990's. When Woodro called my first Firebird a "street car" I realized how far from stock Stock Eliminator really was. After that reality check, I rebuilt the car with a bunch more aftermarket stuff!

The factories built plenty of "special performance" engine combinations in the sixties that had very limited access. The biggest hurdles that they have to face today are emission and crash test standards that did not exist back then.

The transmissions that we are discussing are aftermarket replacements that meet current SFI standards. Not rebuilt older units. When Chevrolet built the first COPO's they decided that the transmissions had to use all new parts. That's why they all got two-speeds!

In 2011 when I started building a 2010 Camaro Stocker, the NHRA made me put a 12-bolt in it. Some time later, they changed the rules to allow a 9" in any 2008 and up car when replacing the IRS. Since the newer Camaros have an available 9.8" ring gear, I don't see this as a problem. Especially since the rear ends being fabricated do not contain one OEM part.

Last edited by GUMP; 08-16-2021 at 06:56 PM.
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2021, 10:10 AM   #5
Stan Weiss
Senior Member
 
Stan Weiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Liked 733 Times in 384 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
I'm thinking that we can both agree that allowing this was a good decision made by the NHRA?




My COPO runs the same head, block, and fuel system as the production Camaro that was also built in the tens of thousands. The throttle body is 90mm just like the production throttle body. The exception would be the intake and cam lift. But, as I have stated many times before, if this were 1969 and the factories had access to these parts, do you really think that they wouldn't use them?


Quote:
...that had a VIN and were available ,(with warranty) for the street for anybody who walked into a Ford dealership, and drive one home. Can you say that about your COPO?...
The boat sailed on the VIN deal a very long time ago. There are plenty of examples of Body-In-White cars dating back to at least the seventies. There was also a time when you could drive your Stocker to the local track, change a few things, and be competitive in class. The rules have changed quite a lot since then. I think that we can agree that a competitive Stocker is now a designated, trailer riding, race car? A better question would be, "Is your Stocker street legal?".




I have been "hand building" stockers since the 1990's. When Woodro called my first Firebird a "street car" I realized how far from stock Stock Eliminator really was. After that reality check, I rebuilt the car with a bunch more aftermarket stuff!

The factories built plenty of "special performance" engine combinations in the sixties that had very limited access. The biggest hurdles that they have to face today are emission and crash test standards that did not exist back then.

The transmissions that we are discussing are aftermarket replacements that meet current SFI standards. Not rebuilt older units. When Chevrolet built the first COPO's they decided that the transmissions had to use all new parts. That's why they all got two-speeds!

In 2011 when I started building a 2010 Camaro Stocker, the NHRA made me put a 12-bolt in it. Some time later, they changed the rules to allow a 9" in any 2008 and up car when replacing the IRS. Since the newer Camaros have an available 9.8" ring gear, I don't see this as a problem. Especially since the rear ends being fabricated do not contain one OEM part.
They did have parts and they did use them. Anyone remember the "FX" classes?


Stan

Last edited by Stan Weiss; 08-16-2021 at 10:12 AM.
Stan Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 08-16-2021, 10:14 AM   #6
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 2,157
Liked 2,336 Times in 549 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Weiss View Post
They did have parts and they did use them. Anyone remember the "FX" classes?
In 1969 solid lifters, aluminum intakes, forged pistons, Holley carburetors, etc. were all considered "cutting edge" parts.
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.