HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2021, 03:59 PM   #21
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris1529 View Post
I have a 2004 Dodge 2500 diesel and an 83 Mustang GT with a T-5 that I can shift without the clutch, neither at WOT, but I'm pretty sure just about any aftermarket stick shift can be shifted w/o clutch.
The rule defines how the transmission is to be used, regardless of what it is capable of.
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2021, 05:02 PM   #22
Ralph A Powell
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Bay City Texas
Posts: 387
Likes: 2
Liked 225 Times in 136 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

YES!

Quote:
Originally Posted by my69396 View Post
Wasn't the rule originally that 500 had to be built to run stock and 50 to run super stock?
Ralph A Powell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2021, 05:15 PM   #23
james schaechter
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 1,281
Liked 1,428 Times in 296 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andys dad View Post
No in high gear ..


Ron
Ron, a stick car could and probably will be faster in high gear,not quicker. Remember that we race the entire track and part of that track is the beginning of tthe track.

Good automatic cars will own the front half of the track vs a similar car with a stick in many classes.

I am not saying they all would work, but there are many that do.

I can’t imagine an automatic FS Car Being afraid of a stick car unless they beat their hp to death already compared to the same car with a stick.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK
james schaechter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2021, 11:04 PM   #24
Bill Bogues
Member
 
Bill Bogues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bethany La.
Posts: 323
Likes: 96
Liked 169 Times in 53 Posts
Smile Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

I think that the way automatic and manual transmissions are ran today that they should just go ahead and put them all in one class. ....... or either go back to the way it used to be: what ever came from factory is what should be used.
__________________
Bill Bogues 4696 STK
Bill Bogues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2021, 11:38 PM   #25
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 315
Liked 1,102 Times in 301 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Personally, I think the modern "factory" PURPOSE BUILT race cars have made enough of a mockery of Stock Eliminator rules already, without kicking the door wide open to even more liberal allowances of non OE components.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2021, 09:29 PM   #26
jmantle
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Black Creek, BC Canada
Posts: 331
Likes: 78
Liked 172 Times in 81 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory McNeil View Post
Personally, I think the modern "factory" PURPOSE BUILT race cars have made enough of a mockery of Stock Eliminator rules already, without kicking the door wide open to even more liberal allowances of non OE components.
Not only have they made a mockery of it but they don't put most of the stock builds in the guide anymore.

Jim Mantle V/SA 6632
__________________
Jim Mantle U/V/SA 6632
jmantle is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 08-14-2021, 11:06 PM   #27
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 2,156
Liked 2,336 Times in 549 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory McNeil View Post
Personally, I think the modern "factory" PURPOSE BUILT race cars have made enough of a mockery of Stock Eliminator rules already, without kicking the door wide open to even more liberal allowances of non OE components.
May I ask what transmission you run?
GUMP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2021, 07:28 PM   #28
Jack Matyas
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethlehem , PA -Christmas City , USA
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 406
Liked 2,050 Times in 398 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jack Matyas
Lightbulb Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory McNeil View Post
Personally, I think the modern "factory" PURPOSE BUILT race cars have made enough of a mockery of Stock Eliminator rules already, without kicking the door wide open to even more liberal allowances of non OE components.
Well better take me off your Christmas card list as many of the cars i've raced will fall into that category - like my '57 Fuel Injected Bel Air in the sixties or my '60 Sedan Delivery 348/320 hp with Hydra-matic transmission in the seventies or better yet my Cutlass factory racer in the eighties - then it really gets good in the 90's when I started with the Firebirds and Camaros with the 350/275 LT1's and later L S series engines and finally lets look at my 04 GTO 350/340 HP ...........And then came the COPO'S --don't you get it - there will always be the next great thing -- it's progress - get used to it !!!!!!!
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO
Jack Matyas is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 08-15-2021, 08:55 PM   #29
Jason
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
So, I am just thinking out loud on this.

Since all the new Factory Cars all run aftermarket SFI versions of Chevrolet transmissions, is it time to allow them for all combinations?

Daren Poole-Adams
Stock/SS 2007
They are already allowed. Since the Cobra Jet Mustang and the Dodge Drag Pak use a Powerglide or a Turbo 400, that means any Ford or Chrysler can use a Chevy transmissions.
Jason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2021, 08:57 PM   #30
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Question Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Matyas View Post
Well better take me off your Christmas card list as many of the cars i've raced will fall into that category - like my '57 Fuel Injected Bel Air in the sixties or my '60 Sedan Delivery 348/320 hp with Hydra-matic transmission in the seventies or better yet my Cutlass factory racer in the eighties - then it really gets good in the 90's when I started with the Firebirds and Camaros with the 350/275 LT1's and later L S series engines and finally lets look at my 04 GTO 350/340 HP ...........And then came the COPO'S --don't you get it - there will always be the next great thing -- it's progress - get used to it !!!!!!!
All of the vehicles you mentioned were available as street cars with VIN numbers, except for the COPO...
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.