New AHFS

[Glenn Briglio]

Originally Posted by GUMP

It looks like we will never see "mineshaft" again. Obviously, this is a drastic change. I can't see where it doesn't penalize hard work.

Someone from the NHRA needs to explain how this won't have the opposite effect on the data base.

These are performance based classes, where's the incentive to go fast? Lonnie??

South Georgia will be interesting.....

Indy will be mineshaft. After that doubtful

[GUMP]

Originally Posted by Glenn Briglio

Indy will be mineshaft. After that doubtful

This year #42 was .948 under......

[Glenn Briglio]

Originally Posted by GUMP

This year #42 was .948 under......

And the previous 5 years ?

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Glenn Briglio

And the previous 5 years ?

2020 was an abbreviated schedule, lower car count, and didn't make mineshaft. 2019 ,18, 17 would have made it easily ,@ .95 under.
Without flat out conditions, I doubt you'll see it at Indy.

[Glenn Briglio]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

2020 was an abbreviated schedule, lower car count, and didn't make mineshaft. 2019 ,18, 17 would have made it easily ,@ .95 under.
Without flat out conditions, I doubt you'll see it at Indy.

#65 qualified at .855 under Indy 2020.

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Glenn Briglio

#65 qualified at .855 under Indy 2020.

Yes.Let me clarify.
I should have spelled out what I meant.
2020 would not have met the new - .95 requirement, even though it was still a flat out deal. ;-)