|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2,803
Liked 2,486 Times in 697 Posts
|
![]()
The 383 or 440 are both good choice in a 67 B Body.
Also the 426 Hemi is excellent but it is pricey. My son and I are very ordinary guys and we have a lot of fun in Stock/SS. I think you still have my number, and you are welcome to call any afternoon. I will be happy to chat with you in more detail when not in public.
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: tomsriver nj
Posts: 480
Likes: 74
Liked 224 Times in 87 Posts
|
![]()
The class combo is like a heads up , it's how far under your index you can run and your reaction time . The tree start will handy cap off the index split of the 2 cars ( just like a bracket race slower leaves first ) . Do you have a copy of nitro joe's ? In Div 1 there are a few BB mopars that run very well. If your car has bin tubed for big tires super stock is your best option. And 8 under isn't a bad please to start .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 233
Likes: 168
Liked 120 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]()
Your car is mini tubbed so stock eliminator is out.
Very familiar with BB mopar bracket engines is great, but doesn't mean much for stock or SS racing. Different as night and day. There are many good running cars on the west coast in all classes A-H, and a few notables in I-M so you won't go very far with a slow car. SS is just cubic dollars to run far under. Lots of RPM. What do you get for setting a national record? About 9 horsepower. LOL Or stay with bracket racing, money ahead. Sounds negative, but trying to be realistic. I didn't even get to the entry fees going up and purses not following, and contingencies going away or no payment. Then the amount of time off work needed to attend races. Last edited by 4406mopar; 02-16-2025 at 01:56 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,171
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]()
Again, your opinion is irrelevant until you have the ballz to SHOW UP......
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
Again, not my opinion, rather 4406mopar's opinion.
Stop being a hater! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 14
Likes: 7
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,171
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]()
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 14
Likes: 7
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So if I?m looking at this correctly, a 1967 Satellite had a shipping weight of 3534. The 383 four barrel, advertised at 325, is factored at 290 with stock 516 heads. This means the weight break number is 12.18, which slots the combo into SS/K, which is an index of 11.25. To be competitive at all, I’d have to have that combo solidly into the 10?s. That seems crazy to me. With stock heads and a 625 cfm AFB. Also, Am I correct that under the GT class, you can run an engine combination from another year, such as a 440 six barrel setup in a 1967 chassis?? Last edited by LemonWedge; 02-17-2025 at 01:46 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|