2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

55 Chevy · 07-04-2008, 04:46 PM

Two things lowering the indexes & not dropping the trigger would do;

1) Get rid of the guys/gals who can only currently run 4/10's under or slower! (Shame on them anyway according to some)!
2) Let NHRA see just who was sandbagging in those fast cars as they are going to be running that much quicker. It will be then be clear to them who needs to be re-factored. More cars then should fall off the backside as slower cars of that combination are again stung deleting even more of the competition. Just what class racing needs,less racers.

My simple answer is the opposite of JD Smith;

1)Leave the indexes where they are.
2) Lower the trigger .35 , then factor those fast combos accordingly.

3) Allow cars to be only so heavy for the class that it is running in at the time. Same consequences as too light,run doesn't count.

07-04-2008, 04:46 PM	#11
55 Chevy Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Calgary,Alberta area Posts: 229 Likes: 23 Liked 20 Times in 15 Posts	Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced Two things lowering the indexes & not dropping the trigger would do; 1) Get rid of the guys/gals who can only currently run 4/10's under or slower! (Shame on them anyway according to some)! 2) Let NHRA see just who was sandbagging in those fast cars as they are going to be running that much quicker. It will be then be clear to them who needs to be re-factored. More cars then should fall off the backside as slower cars of that combination are again stung deleting even more of the competition. Just what class racing needs,less racers. My simple answer is the opposite of JD Smith; 1)Leave the indexes where they are. 2) Lower the trigger .35 , then factor those fast combos accordingly. 3) Allow cars to be only so heavy for the class that it is running in at the time. Same consequences as too light,run doesn't count.