|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What would you do if the NHRA banned timers in .90 (Super) class racing? | |||
| I'd like it and keep racing the current .90 classes. My car isn't high mph anyway. |
   
|
34 | 47.89% |
| I'd like it and keep racing the current .90 classes. I'd sell my 632" and pay off my mortgage. |
  
|
1 | 1.41% |
| I'd grudgingly accept it and race my 160 mph S/ST car in S/C. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Do you know how much I spent on this dry sump 632? I'm going Top Sportsman racing! |
  
|
4 | 5.63% |
| I'd hunt down the bastard who proposed it and beat him with the dry sump off of my spare 632. |
  
|
32 | 45.07% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-17-2008, 02:59 PM
|
#11 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Commerce, Mi
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: What would you do if the NHRA banned timers in .90 (Super) class racing?
the problem is they want less classes not more......what is this distinct advantage thing.....the good racers win no matter what the rules are...or how fast the cars are.....what do you think, we just decided to spend more money on our motors....we worked hard to scrape the money together to make them faster....If you don't like what you have...figure out how to change it....changing the rules to suite yourself is not gonna do it....move on.....change the subject....I'm done
CBS |
|
|
|
Threaded Mode