|
![]() |
#31 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 64
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
And ?!?!?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Member
|
![]()
Roller Cam's in Stock will never happen or roller Lifters.if you want that Build a Newer Car they already have Rollers.Face it be glad that we have what we have and make the best of it. Jeff Teuton tried to help us old car people.I too lost a new motor to the shoebecks.tool steal is the only way to go.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 775
Likes: 530
Liked 230 Times in 106 Posts
|
![]()
Yep
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Reason for question is seems Stock is becoming Super Stock as each tech point is relaxed year after year. Makes it easier to tech too but is there an end point people would accept as "far enough" for Stock rules to expand to let them just Run as last year?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
VIP Member
|
![]() Quote:
Lol to the "Slacker" comment too Dan...I'd shake your hand for that one!!!! ![]()
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) Last edited by GarysZ24; 01-16-2016 at 07:00 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wingdale, NY
Posts: 302
Likes: 27
Liked 53 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
In response to "build a newer car so you can run roller cam" I posted that question just to make sure before I spend $ on lifters, thats all. I am a low buck guy, will have 12K total in my 65 BBC Impala.
Not just newer cars with roller cam, I have all parts to build that 151 4 Cylinder for the 85 Camaro to run W/SA , that has roller cam plus FI. Will L |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 1,074
Liked 799 Times in 236 Posts
|
![]()
Would allowing roller cams/lifters in place of flat tappet cams/lifters save racers money? Yes. But is that where we want things to go? My personal opinion...no.That said, there are several areas where rules changes could be made in Stock that would save racers significant costs while still being reflective of the intention of the class. -Al
__________________
"That'll never work....." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 1,279
Liked 1,428 Times in 296 Posts
|
![]()
Sorry, I took your question literally. I think I understand now.
Quote:
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 560
Likes: 45
Liked 52 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
Dang, Nascar CUP cars, the big boys, have just recently switched to roller cams and lifters, imagine the beatings that the old flat tappet set up took and yet it stayed together.
Yeah, they also dropped the max RPM as well but before that you had an engine running non stop for hours at WOT at around 9K plus RPM. Very impressive indeed.
__________________
Bernie Cunningham 7053 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|