|
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 3,564
Liked 7,594 Times in 1,718 Posts
|
![]()
Hurray!!! Hey NHRA, now how about going after some FFFord and Chevy intakes!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm OK..........it's everybody else. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 6
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
I have two. The new head face angle rule probably will make other parts illegal too! I guess I need to get a car built before everything is made illegal. No wonder most people think I'm nuts for wanting to run Stock or SS.
__________________
Mopar 2 Ya! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
james I got a super stocker ill sell you way cheaper than you can build one
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 2,306
Liked 3,099 Times in 954 Posts
|
![]()
It’s a deal too...
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 63
Liked 701 Times in 279 Posts
|
![]()
What's all the fuss about? This intake was with nothing in ET. So im told. LOL
Last edited by Jeff Stout; 12-06-2019 at 09:44 AM. Reason: More |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: White Rock,bc canada
Posts: 69
Likes: 59
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
About time, i was in a heads up race and on a second under pass and lifted after seeing just tail lights of the 65 Valiant I looked at their car's incrementals and it was on a 1.30 under pass
NHRA Tech Department makes changes to the engine blue print specifications Dec. 4, 2019 The NHRA Technical Department recently made changes to the blueprint specifications. This change is in regards to the use of the Mopar Performance 2836139 (LD-4B) intake manifold for the 1965 thru 1967 Mopar Stock engines. On December 4th, 2019 the NHRA Tech Dept. deleted this part from the Blueprint specs. This was done following extensive research and review of our files from the manufacturer. This part was not an OEM part and was a dealer replacement. Per the NHRA rule book equipment other than factory installed is prohibited. On January 1st, 2020 this part will no longer be permitted. Last edited by Greg Marshall; 12-06-2019 at 03:58 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 530
Likes: 409
Liked 241 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
It is amazing the celebrating that goes on here against the Mopar contigent. What is there maybe 3 or 4 cars that had that manifold? Lots of bogus Chebies and Phords. The car I am familiar with that had the LD340 manifold went just a quick without it at INDY.
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 530
Likes: 409
Liked 241 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
It is amazing the celebrating that goes on here against the Mopar contigent. What is there maybe 3 or 4 cars that had that manifold? Lots of bogus Chebies and Phords. The car I am familiar with that had the LD340 manifold went just a quick without it at INDY. Just like happened with the AMC stuff how many racers are you going to lose. I remember when the phords got bigger cams and manifolds and carbs where was the protest then? 327 intakes on 283 chebies?
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|