HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Class Racer Builds
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-23-2014, 07:47 AM   #11
HP HUNTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 372 Times in 129 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo

Quote:
Originally Posted by HandOverFist View Post
You are correct...I'm learning that all the stars must be aligned for one of these cars to perform as intended. I've put the car back to it's previous state as far as I can remember. All angles are still the same and the convertor was cut open/inspected. There was a slight tweak to get a little more stall, but I can't tell any difference in the way it feels. I have yet to change the way I stage/stall the car. I'm beginning to suspect that those carbs were running very rich all along and coupled with good cool air earlier in the year was the reason for the good 60' times then. I guess the summer air was a death blow for the way these carbs are set up. I have one unmolested Edelbrock Q-jet I'm working on atm and will try to set it up very lean for this summer heat.
Who cut the converter? Difference in Baro and DA from Spring air to current air? What temp do you leave at? When you changed the drive shaft was there a weight difference? Always weigh every thing in the drive line, I can only imagine how critical that would be in a setup like yours.

Last edited by HP HUNTER; 06-23-2014 at 07:55 AM.
HP HUNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.