questions concerning christmas tree

bill dedman · 11-17-2009, 12:58 AM

Ed wrote: "I'm done,you will carry this crusade till the next apple falls off the tree and ignites another bomb in your head.

And, Bill wrote:

And you STILL won't understand it. LOL!

There are "none so blind as those who WILL NOT SEE," even when it benefits them.

Some people just can't stand to lose an argument.... regardless of what's right.

I have asked you whether you think a rule that benefits certain racers is superior to one that benefits NOBODY.... but, you never answer that question.

Instead, you write gibberish that has nothing to do with the subject at hand, attacking the person, rather than the issue.

That's because you know you're wrong, and don't want to admit it.

If you had a legitimate reason not to change this first red light rule, you'd surely, have told me, by now.

You haven't, won't, and can't.... because there is none.

Why don't you just admit it, so Mike Carr will be freed from his compulsion to read these over-long, repetitive, redundant notes that say the same thing 17 different ways, so that MAYBE, one of them will break through that fog that obscures the logic from your mind, and finally, you'll "get it."

Why can't you give me a reason, Ed; just ONE...
__________________

11-17-2009, 12:58 AM	#11
bill dedman VIP Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Conway, AR Posts: 1,739 Likes: 0 Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts	Re: questions concerning christmas tree Ed wrote: "I'm done,you will carry this crusade till the next apple falls off the tree and ignites another bomb in your head. And, Bill wrote: And you STILL won't understand it. LOL! There are "none so blind as those who WILL NOT SEE," even when it benefits them. Some people just can't stand to lose an argument.... regardless of what's right. I have asked you whether you think a rule that benefits certain racers is superior to one that benefits NOBODY.... but, you never answer that question. Instead, you write gibberish that has nothing to do with the subject at hand, attacking the person, rather than the issue. That's because you know you're wrong, and don't want to admit it. If you had a legitimate reason not to change this first red light rule, you'd surely, have told me, by now. You haven't, won't, and can't.... because there is none. Why don't you just admit it, so Mike Carr will be freed from his compulsion to read these over-long, repetitive, redundant notes that say the same thing 17 different ways, so that MAYBE, one of them will break through that fog that obscures the logic from your mind, and finally, you'll "get it." Why can't you give me a reason, Ed; just ONE... __________________ __________________ Bill Last edited by bill dedman; 11-17-2009 at 01:02 AM.