Once again a bogus combination

Dean Roberts · 04-20-2010, 07:01 AM

Alan, sorry for the name calling, however, you are not making sense. Relax, take a breath and learn the facts.

Fact Number 1: GM did not build a 1998 F-body with an LT-1.
Fact Number 2: GM obviously submitted paperwork saying it did build such car.

So, if what you are saying is correct, this is OK, because the engine was already in the guide and the car in question is similar to the prior years car? That is a joke and would set precedent for allowing any engine in the guide to be used in a similar body car with the same name? you are right on one account, we have a place for this and it is called Super Stock GT.

Why not just allow an LS-1 in any year Camaro? The engine is in the guide and it came in a Camaro. Is that cool?

04-20-2010, 07:01 AM	#11
Dean Roberts Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 87 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Once again a bogus combination Alan, sorry for the name calling, however, you are not making sense. Relax, take a breath and learn the facts. Fact Number 1: GM did not build a 1998 F-body with an LT-1. Fact Number 2: GM obviously submitted paperwork saying it did build such car. So, if what you are saying is correct, this is OK, because the engine was already in the guide and the car in question is similar to the prior years car? That is a joke and would set precedent for allowing any engine in the guide to be used in a similar body car with the same name? you are right on one account, we have a place for this and it is called Super Stock GT. Why not just allow an LS-1 in any year Camaro? The engine is in the guide and it came in a Camaro. Is that cool?