|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
Just thinking out loud here, but if IHRA makes the CJ cars legal in the EFI Stock classes, then wouldn't the (body only) be legal in Stock/ GT ?
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
8.0 lbs for A/PS is the top class. After the first few V-10 drag packs hit the track the HP factor will gain "weight" Its human nature to run fast. Besides the last time I wrote the rules "Pure Stock" cars were supposed to be show room avaliable and in the hands of the general public. More than 50 or 70 required. You would have to put mufflers on that V-10 monster anyway and drive the water pump off of the crank. . Does Chrysler supply the cam duration/overlap specs along with valve spring pressures for inspection purposes? Naaaaaaaaaaaaa ! Same deal for the Fords.
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 12-12-2010 at 12:26 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 34
Liked 138 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]()
With all the talk about the new cars needing their own class, at least until they get factored correctly, IHRA can continue on the new car only AA/FI and AA/FIA classes with BB/FI, CC/FI, etc. for the rest of them with their own indexes. (Not sure if somebody suggested this format before.) I believe J/SA Mustangs were the lowest class talked about for the new cars.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Donaldsonville, LA
Posts: 980
Likes: 17
Liked 228 Times in 70 Posts
|
![]()
Myron,
Very good point. If IHRA establishes these classes now I am sure it would probably please the majority (people without Dps or CJs). This class can be listed as for '08 and newer model Fuel injected cars. The one thing about IHRA is that they actually listen to racers opinions and ideas. I would not be surprised to see IHRA adopt something like this. If IHRA truly wants to seperate the new cars they will do something like this. IHRA is looking better all the time. Also, you have to agree with Jack's point. However, if you consistently make round and run enough races you will begin to meet up with the new cars, not to mention as more of these cars continue to pop up. Probably the main reason old cars vs Dps didn't happen that often is because there simply weren't a large number of these new cars together at multiple races.
__________________
Jimmy "Cooter" Hidalgo, Jr. 4865 E/SA '04 GTO 4865 SS/GA '99 Firebird |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 6
Liked 70 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
Aren't they really "Crate Motor" cars?
__________________
Chris Bowman The Mountain State Mustang 1984 Mustang GT350 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
Stock GT....1979 and earlier engines ??
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 6
Liked 70 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
I was really just making a joke....especially since I run a crate motor car!
__________________
Chris Bowman The Mountain State Mustang 1984 Mustang GT350 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|