|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Bay City Texas
Posts: 389
Likes: 2
Liked 225 Times in 136 Posts
|
![]()
In other words paper combos? Bennett learned from the best at Oldsmobile!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,664
Likes: 1,954
Liked 10,834 Times in 2,252 Posts
|
![]()
My C10 truck is a real 1986 v6 Q-Jet stick truck. The only Paper Parts are the title and a record or two.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,821
Likes: 2,915
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If someone goes to the extra length and gets it submitted, nothing wrong or phony about that. ************* As the Rounded-Line series were redesignated the R/V trucks for 1987, several changes were made to the powertrain line. The 292 I6 was dropped from 3⁄4-ton and 1-ton trucks, with the 4.3 L V6 becoming the sole 6-cylinder engine; all engines adopted fuel injection (with the exception of the 6.2 L diesel).[2][31] In addition, a "smart" powertrain control module (PCM) was also introduced, which controlled the fuel injection system, fuel-to-air burn ratio, engine ignition timing, and (if equipped with an automatic transmission) the Turbo Hydra-Matic's turbine torque converter clutch.[47] Following the transition of 1⁄2-ton pickups to the fourth-generation GMT400 chassis, the R/V series was offered with three engines from 1987 to 1991: a standard 5.7 L V8 with the option of either a 7.4 L V8 or the 6.2 L diesel V8.[48] Chevrolet/GMC C/K powertrain details (1973-1991)[49][50] Engine Engine family Production Code (RPO) Output Notes Horsepower Torque 250 cu in (4.1 L) I6 Chevrolet Turbo-Thrift 1973–1979 LD4 105 hp (78 kW) 185 lb⋅ft (251 N⋅m) 1979–1984 LE3 130 hp (97 kW) 210 lb⋅ft (285 N⋅m) 262 cu in (4.3 L) V6 Chevrolet 90° V6 1985-1986 LB1 155 hp (116 kW) 230 lb⋅ft (312 N⋅m) 4-bbl 1987 LB4 155 hp (116 kW) 230 lb⋅ft (312 N⋅m) TBI
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 166 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]()
I've always wanted to do a 90-91 454SS pickup, but that factor of 310hp on a 2 barrel 7.5:1 454 that was OE rated 255hp really takes the wind out of the sails lol
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: lyndon ky. ... louisville area
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 29
Liked 477 Times in 117 Posts
|
![]()
since the hydramatic debacle it was determined since the sedan deliveries were buiult on station wagon platform it was a car no hydramatics (marv ripes throws a party)
the shaw & wong story was determined opposite since the elco had a 117' WB frame that was only used in this platform from 1977-1987 and was by all GM printed info a truck (sales info and EPA compliance) it was a truck (that cost me bending 6 exhaust valves on my 305 with that 430' cam) bummer i requested from mr Pat a statement saying such >> i have such a official email states ALL elcos are trucks i even replied and re ask so even a 60 would be a truck with curiosity killing me as to how much a 430 cam might help a 60 283 instead of 399 ... hmmmm and reply was stated > ALL ELCAMINOS ARE TRUCKS. im not gonna be the guy who tells the SS dudes ill let mr Pat hes great at making friends that way (wait till the AAMA stuff hits) p.s. i have had the HP reduced on the 78 305/145-180 reduced by 3 last 2 years to 174 and it is still listed in the malibu section but i ve been told the cars cant use it ???? i agree the class guide needs to be fixed showing this as fact captain gonna run the elco at vegas and it could be purchased if ya wanna get in on this ![]()
__________________
Jack McCarthy 3609 STK "the Captain" |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|