HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-09-2022, 10:16 AM   #1
Paul Wong
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
Default Re: AHFS Foibles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph A Powell View Post
In other words paper combos? Bennett learned from the best at Oldsmobile!
There is NOTHING paper about these truck combinations. There are laundry list of them left if someone wants to run out and build a 117" plus wheelbase stocker
Paul Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2022, 11:38 AM   #2
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,821
Likes: 2,915
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
Default Re: AHFS Foibles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Wong View Post
There is NOTHING paper about these truck combinations. There are laundry list of them left if someone wants to run out and build a 117" plus wheelbase stocker
Yup... The 87 I mentioned is definitely not a paper combo.In fact , quite common. For some reason, it was never submitted to NHRA.
If someone goes to the extra length and gets it submitted, nothing wrong or phony about that.
*************
As the Rounded-Line series were redesignated the R/V trucks for 1987, several changes were made to the powertrain line. The 292 I6 was dropped from 3⁄4-ton and 1-ton trucks, with the 4.3 L V6 becoming the sole 6-cylinder engine; all engines adopted fuel injection (with the exception of the 6.2 L diesel).[2][31] In addition, a "smart" powertrain control module (PCM) was also introduced, which controlled the fuel injection system, fuel-to-air burn ratio, engine ignition timing, and (if equipped with an automatic transmission) the Turbo Hydra-Matic's turbine torque converter clutch.[47]

Following the transition of 1⁄2-ton pickups to the fourth-generation GMT400 chassis, the R/V series was offered with three engines from 1987 to 1991: a standard 5.7 L V8 with the option of either a 7.4 L V8 or the 6.2 L diesel V8.[48]
Chevrolet/GMC C/K powertrain details (1973-1991)[49][50]
Engine Engine family Production Code

(RPO)
Output Notes
Horsepower Torque
250 cu in (4.1 L) I6 Chevrolet Turbo-Thrift 1973–1979 LD4 105 hp (78 kW) 185 lb⋅ft (251 N⋅m)
1979–1984 LE3 130 hp (97 kW) 210 lb⋅ft (285 N⋅m)
262 cu in (4.3 L) V6 Chevrolet 90° V6 1985-1986 LB1 155 hp (116 kW) 230 lb⋅ft (312 N⋅m) 4-bbl
1987 LB4 155 hp (116 kW) 230 lb⋅ft (312 N⋅m) TBI
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 12:07 PM   #3
Chipper Chapman
Member
 
Chipper Chapman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 166 Times in 71 Posts
Default Re: AHFS Foibles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Yup...

Following the transition of 1⁄2-ton pickups to the fourth-generation GMT400 chassis, the R/V series was offered with three engines from 1987 to 1991: a standard 5.7 L V8 with the option of either a 7.4 L V8 or the 6.2 L diesel V8.[48]
I've always wanted to do a 90-91 454SS pickup, but that factor of 310hp on a 2 barrel 7.5:1 454 that was OE rated 255hp really takes the wind out of the sails lol
__________________
Chris Chapman
1969 Chevelle
NHRA F-G/SA 1090
Chipper Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2022, 03:52 PM   #4
Jack McCarthy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: lyndon ky. ... louisville area
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 29
Liked 477 Times in 117 Posts
Exclamation Re: AHFS Foibles

since the hydramatic debacle it was determined since the sedan deliveries were buiult on station wagon platform it was a car no hydramatics (marv ripes throws a party)

the shaw & wong story was determined opposite since the elco had a 117' WB frame that was only used in this platform from 1977-1987 and was by all GM printed info a truck (sales info and EPA compliance) it was a truck (that cost me bending 6 exhaust valves on my 305 with that 430' cam) bummer

i requested from mr Pat a statement saying such >> i have such a official email states ALL elcos are trucks i even replied and re ask so even a 60 would be a truck with curiosity killing me as to how much a 430 cam might help a 60 283 instead of 399 ... hmmmm and reply was stated > ALL ELCAMINOS ARE TRUCKS.

im not gonna be the guy who tells the SS dudes ill let mr Pat hes great at making friends that way (wait till the AAMA stuff hits)

p.s. i have had the HP reduced on the 78 305/145-180 reduced by 3 last 2 years to 174 and it is still listed in the malibu section but i ve been told the cars cant use it ????

i agree the class guide needs to be fixed showing this as fact

captain

gonna run the elco at vegas and it could be purchased if ya wanna get in on this
__________________
Jack McCarthy 3609 STK
"the Captain"
Jack McCarthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2022, 07:09 PM   #5
Tom P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 30
Liked 239 Times in 94 Posts
Default Re: AHFS Foibles

RJ, I had a 67 Ranchero 390, 4 speed and wanted to run that in Stock but it wasn't in the guide.
Tom P is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.