New rules for 2010?

bill dedman · 09-22-2009, 08:13 PM

Jim, As I see it, the problem is in no way the cars themselves; they don't have 40/60 front-to-rear weight distribution, vastly superior aerodynamics or much of anything you can't do to a '69 Camaro (which I only use as an example, because they can run a variety of classes from AA, down.)

The problem is, getting the people at NHRA to put a workable, realistic, FACTOR on them, and they won't be any more of a threat than any other Stocker with a factor that has proven reasonable.

IF NHRA will factor them realistically, so they can't totally dominate, I think all the problems relating to these anomalies will go away.

If NHRA refuses to do that, then what you're proposing would surely be better than what we have, now.

09-22-2009, 08:13 PM	#20
bill dedman VIP Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Conway, AR Posts: 1,739 Likes: 0 Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts	Re: New rules for 2010? Jim, As I see it, the problem is in no way the cars themselves; they don't have 40/60 front-to-rear weight distribution, vastly superior aerodynamics or much of anything you can't do to a '69 Camaro (which I only use as an example, because they can run a variety of classes from AA, down.) The problem is, getting the people at NHRA to put a workable, realistic, FACTOR on them, and they won't be any more of a threat than any other Stocker with a factor that has proven reasonable. IF NHRA will factor them realistically, so they can't totally dominate, I think all the problems relating to these anomalies will go away. If NHRA refuses to do that, then what you're proposing would surely be better than what we have, now. __________________ Bill Last edited by bill dedman; 09-22-2009 at 08:14 PM. Reason: my stupidity